Tuesday, 13 May 2008

Tackling the Skeptics' Gordian Knot






It's not easy being a Skeptic, with a capital Skep.

I should know, for I made a valiant attempt to be one, for many years, and failed dismally.

The ability to hold onto the sort of Skepticism which usually goes along with Atheism, with a capital disdain for the Gods, has been one of the more spectacular failures in my life so far.

For a while, it's sort of comforting.

You know all those loose ends, all those questions for which you don't have any good answers? Well, they can all be tied up nice and neatly, no ends flapping in the breeze, if you subscribe to the 'It must have a rational explanation, and any rational-sounding explanation will do' form of skepticism.

Of course I was always going to be miserable at this - but it seems I had to try, if only to justify, in some manner, all the time and energy I'd put into becoming a scientist.

Pity it didn't last-then I could take a satisfied look at that giant knot of resolved unresolved questions, label the whole boiling 'explicable' and turn my back on it.

On Sunday night, I woke up from my customary light sleep when I heard my name being called, clearly and distinctly.

I looked at my sleeping partner who was snoring and who has never been given to talking in his sleep, and wondered, for a brief moment, if I could blame it on him.
After all, it was a male voice of approximately the same range and timbre that had called me awake, so it could have been Warren, couldn't it?

For that brief moment I also ignored the fact that my body was trembling quite violently - that my earthly components were already in full possession of the fact that I had been woken up by my father calling my name.

I'm not as stupid as I would have made out when I was still a Skeptic. I had heard that voice for more than 40 years and have recalled it in my mind many times over the last 7 years since I last heard it and, unlike poor old Carl Sagan, I know the difference.

12 comments:

  1. Hi there ... hope everything is fine in your world. I can relate to being a skeptic, and was one for a very long time, particularly regarding some of the farther out details on paranorma and such. I've found that as time goes on, and experience serves us, like the layers of an onion, skepticism is peeled away until only faith remains.

    D~

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Donna,

    I think one of the things which annoys me the most about skepticism is it's insistance on rationalising away things which you know very well don't have a reductionist, scientific reason.
    You're supposed to ignore the evidence of your own senses in an attempt to reduce the All to equations.
    Love,
    Terri in Joburg

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Terri ... yep, you said it.

    "Things which you know very well don't have a reductionist, scientific reason" = FAITH

    Can be so tricky sometimes, you know?

    Luv,
    D~

    ReplyDelete
  4. HI Kay,

    Yes- I know how you feel, having been there myself.
    It;s maybe soomething we all have to go through at some time or another-I did, I see Donna did, many of my Pagan friends have been Atheists/Skeptics at some point.
    I wish you only love, Kay. You'll get through this, too.

    Donna,
    I'm not sure that I'm ready to call it faith, yet.
    Small steps for me. At the moment I'm focusing on those things which I have experiential confirmation of being true, while people who have not had those experiences dare to say I'm imagining.

    Love,
    Terri in Joburg

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've never been an Atheist, but I am a victim of "rationalizing". Less than a day after my grandfather's death, before anyone had even the time to begin planning his funeral, I could've sworn I heard his voice. In the years since I have rationalized the experience 6 ways to Sunday. I still have my doubts though I wish more than anything that I could just believe it was him and that there is without a doubt life after this world.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well,I have no more doubts about - not necessarily life after death, but about there being much more to the human being than meets the tenets of scientific respectability.

    One of the defning moments for me was when I saw my father, on the day he died, unknown to me by any rational means whatsoever.

    Funily enough, I became an Atheist very shortly after that moment- says something about me, I suppose!
    Love,
    Terri

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is a really good conversation, Terri...(Hi Kay...long time no see here too!) In my experience a handsome dollop of skepticism is very healthy - particularly in the life of the spirit. Even the ultimate skeptic would have to agree that there arethings that we just cannot articulate in purely material or scientific ways.

    How we negotiate a place between the two, for me at least is informed by both knowledge and openess to a subjective and yet transcendent experience. It seems most likely that that is where wisdom lives...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ok, K you guys - I admit I was feeling tetchy and grumpy about skeptics when I wrote this!

    I do agree that some degree of skepticism is healthy.That's why I specified the Skeptic with a capital Skep as the victim of my ire - there's nothing you can say or do to such a person to cause them to look twice at something once they have labelled it 'woo'.

    Sigh.
    This blog is a great outlet for my angry energy, though.

    Love,
    Terri

    ReplyDelete
  9. Your angry seems tamer than mine somehow. LOL. I just rant my butt off and hope I don't peeve too many people off. I dig the honesty of your "angry energy".

    I am a skeptic about a lot of things. I find most psychics/mediums to be frauds and I have yet to get a reading that left me with a "wow" or even an eerie sense that the person knew anything. I will admit this might be a case of the few ruining it for the many - as in John Edwards, Sylvia Browne, etc. Most of the time I just wish I could believe though.

    I think you're experience is amazing and I almost envy you for it. :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am a huge skeptic! However somethings can't be ignored. I've had too many personal experiences that tell me otherwise. Owl foretold my grandmothers death in a dream one night (I didn't understand at the time), I swear I caused the lift gate of a truck to break just by willing it to happen, thank the gods no one was hurt (I am very careful about what I think about now).
    Yet in spite of all this I remain cautiously skeptical, if you know what I mean.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes, I know whatyou mean, aor.

    I guess I'm just tired of being blanket-tagged with a 'woo' label for some of the very real experiences I've had.

    When it comes to a showdown between scientific repeatability and my own knowledge (not just 'what I want to believe')then my own senses are going to win every time.

    I'm no longer brain-deficient, and I suppose I resent being labelled flaky because I've decided to trust the evidence of my eyes, ears and other bits on occaision.
    Where's that spell-checker??

    Love,
    Terri

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think it is my fear of being labeled a weirdo that keeps my skepticism going. I not at the point where I trust myself yet with what I know. I'm not overly vocal about what I've experienced and what I feel to be truth because of my fear of being tagged a loco.

    I hope I will get over it someday :-)

    ReplyDelete