I’m going to stick my two cents in here concerning the
almighty row which appears to have broken out in the US at Pantheocon his year,
despite the undeniable facts that I am not American and have never attended
this gathering.
Last year, for those of you unaware of what went on, there
were a lot of very hurt Pagans left licking their wounds when a ritual billed
as Dianic revealed, rather late in the day, that by “women only” the organisers
of the ritual meant cis women only.
That is, women born with 2 X-chromosomes in every cell, who retained the
identity of women. Trans- women were informed, apparently, that this ritual was
not for them when they pitched up to attend. This was an old-style Dianic
affair which did not admit any but
cis-gendered women.
The reprisals on both sides seemed quite hectic.
This year, a similar sort of ritual was offered, with the
proviso being made, right at the end of the description that it was for
“genetic women only”.
Now, leaving aside the question of whether or not a trans
person who was born a woman and had chosen to identify as male would have been
welcomed by this wording, this (apparent) attempt to avoid the trauma of last
year’s ambiguity has seeded a backlash quite as hectic as the original furore.
Let me attempt to lay my cards on the table here: as a
double-X woman encultured in this sick society, I have every reason to believe
that safe space for women is sometimes in short supply and is, moreover, often
needed. Places where women need not feel threatened, diminished or patronised
in any way by men are not common in the male-dominated patriarchy we all live
within.
Indeed, male privilege and domination is so basic to the
fabric of this culture that it is often unperceived, making it hard for those
with deep cultural engraining to understand just why some women would feel,
well, not quite in a perfectly safe place in the presence of the dominating
class. And this includes women born male physically.
As someone who is deeply aware of how the dominant paradigm
often reviles or dismisses the concerns – and even the existence!-of women,
non-human animals, plants and the land
itself, I realise on an almost visceral level that sometimes, members of
the non-dominant species (that’s most of us) have a need to gather in settings
which feel non-threatening, especially perhaps for something as baring of the
soul as spiritual ritual.
On the other hand, people I esteem and respect highly –
among them Thorn Coyle – found it needful to sit, or stand, in silent
meditation outside the site of this proposed ritual at Pantheocon the other
day. And here I’m in danger of sounding as if I’m contradicting myself, for I
fully empathise with those silent protestors, too.
(I would really recommend you go here to read Thorn’s deeply
moving take on the affair.)
For who knows, unless they’ve been there themselves, the
deep wounds a person who identifies with a gender not of the
culturally-approved binary type lives with, all the time? Attacks upon people
of trans-, bi-, homo- or just other-sexuality are the order of the day in
probably the majority of countries on this planet today. Who can bear the pain
of being told you’re not a real woman,
man…whatever, because of the way you were born or the way you look or the soul
you have taken the time to commune with? This is insupportable viciousness, and
very common in this culture.
So were Thorn and companions right to hold silent vigil
before the doors to the ritual space? Yes, they were, in my opinion.
And was Z. correct to want to provide a safe space for those
not quite comfortable with the dominant gender, however configured, and to
clarify that proviso? Yes, again.
Both actions were, as I feel it, correct actions.
Moreover, something which seems to have been missed in all
the outrage, however justified, is this: both
groups were rightly protesting the deadly presence of the over-culture,
which makes insane, makes sick in the soul, and which damages the living - and
indeed the no longer living - in so many, many ways.
May the Ancestors take notice, and shower blessings and
healing upon all who suffered here.
Pic: Through my front door
I'm sorry but there's a basic part of this that i am missing.
ReplyDeleteWhy does "my" right to be included with others, overshadow the right of others to be exclusive?
Like me demanding to be part of a black businessman's group. Even if i could force them to "accept" me, i would be an outsider, by definition.
Especially something "spiritual", you cannot barge in and demand to be part of it? By doing that, you're destroying it as you enter.
Not that i'd want to be part of a dianic ritual, but only if i were invited would it be acceptable to arrive and expect to join in, at the pleasure of those already there.
Is it not so?
peace and love :)
Yup.
ReplyDeletePerhaps the background is not so clear on this one David: there were apparently some remarks from Z Budapest about trans- and other non-cisgendered women not being "real" women.
It's one of the myriad ways we find to hurt each other - but, see, I empathise with both points of view here.
Love,
T
I'm not sure what all the fuss is about here. If they want to define women by sex rather than by gender, surely they have a right to do so?
ReplyDeleteIf you don't like their thing, do your own, and take a "Live and let live" attitude to it.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI think, Steve, that in this case it may be that the fact that Z. Budapest(the ritual originator and leader) is a widely revered and important Pagan Elder, and that she is credited with some really viscious statements wrt trans women in particular not being 'real' women.
ReplyDeleteShe is of course welcome to her opinion, but her visiblity and influence in the Pagan community makes this quite a big deal..err.
Love,
T
I've been thinking and reading about this, and here's my thinking:
ReplyDeleteIMHO, it's hegelian tactics at it's best, 2 extremes of a group fighting each other. Neither is correct, yet neither position is the goal. The goal is to break down "private religious ceremonies" on all levels, and remove that which is truly sacred.
Agree with you completely though, very unnecessary, very dirty.
It also concerns me that a very visible "elder" in any community as shown to be as vicious as this lady. Nothing good can come of her.
peace and love T, and a strife free weekend :)